Presented by: Matthew Monaco
Authors: Matthew Monaco, Oliver Michel, Eric Keller
SDN controller platforms are often compared to operating systems, but existing controllers are more like kernels. This means that programmers must re-implement common functionality such as event handlers, timers, etc. from scratch in each new application.
Yanc (Yet Another Network Controller) is a new SDN controller platform based on classic Unix principles. It follows the "everything is a file" philosophy, which leads naturally to a simple and lightweight interface for accessing network hardware, and enables re-using standard off-the-shelf utilities in network control programs. As an example, the directory structure for a single OpenFlow switches is organized as follows:
/sw1 |-- counters/ |-- flows/ |-- ports/ |-- actions |-- capabilities |-- id +-- num_buffersThis work is important because it represents a serious attempt to deliver on the vision of a "network operating system" and it proposes a fresh SDN controller architecture that makes it possible to put existing operating system abstractions to work. For example, programmers can re-use existing Linux abstractions such as:
- inotify for event processing
- file permissions and access control lists for security
- namespaces and cgroups for performance isolation
- distributed file systems for simple forms of state replication and coordination
The Yanc prototype is based on File System in Userspace (FUSE), a C++ OpenFlow driver, a Python discovery module, and a shell script to push rules. Future work includes defining new drivers for other back-ends such as Snort, developing richer operators for composing network programs, and further investigating issues related to distributed control.
Q: What about performance? The POSIX filesystem imposes all kinds of semantics that might limit parallelism. Does the FUSE implementation serialize a list of creations?
A: No, many file system operations can be implemented in parallel or asynchronously. Moreover, even if they were sequential, the latency of a packet_in "miss" far exceeds the latency of these file system operations anyway.
Q: Can distributed file systems be used to coordinate SDN controllers?
A: Perhaps! We are exploring the use of distributed file systems to implement functionality such as distributing locks for concurrency control, etc.
Post a Comment